Image Semiotics / Archives : Différence entre versions
De erg
(Page créée avec « Catégorie:English Professor: Raphaël Pirenne Starting from the assessment that every artistic practice is directly and/or indirectly informed by its cultural, econo... ») |
m (Sammy a déplacé la page Semiology Image vers Image Semiotics / Archives) |
||
| (2 révisions intermédiaires par le même utilisateur non affichées) | |||
| Ligne 1 : | Ligne 1 : | ||
| − | [[ | + | Teacher: [[Raphaël Pirenne]] |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | + | The archive is often relegated to a form of the past whose value or use has been neutralized by history. The course will start from the premise that the archive is not necessarily something to be grasped as a collection, despite Arlette Farge's subtle comments on archival collections, but as a piece of land or a garden to be cultivated, where action by action, thought by thought, something will emerge from the soil to benefit from another or a new use value. The first part of the course will be built around collective readings of texts deploying a thought of the archive: Farge, Foucault, Derrida, Agamben, Foster, Lepecki, etc., or exhibitions (Enwezor, Merewether, etc.) or practices crystallizing a thought of the archive (Baloji, Meessen, Eichhorn, Kelly, etc.). The second part is built around a common object that emerges from the discussions and enables us to put into action a way of thinking about the archive. | |
Version actuelle datée du 1 juin 2023 à 12:35
Teacher: Raphaël Pirenne
The archive is often relegated to a form of the past whose value or use has been neutralized by history. The course will start from the premise that the archive is not necessarily something to be grasped as a collection, despite Arlette Farge's subtle comments on archival collections, but as a piece of land or a garden to be cultivated, where action by action, thought by thought, something will emerge from the soil to benefit from another or a new use value. The first part of the course will be built around collective readings of texts deploying a thought of the archive: Farge, Foucault, Derrida, Agamben, Foster, Lepecki, etc., or exhibitions (Enwezor, Merewether, etc.) or practices crystallizing a thought of the archive (Baloji, Meessen, Eichhorn, Kelly, etc.). The second part is built around a common object that emerges from the discussions and enables us to put into action a way of thinking about the archive.