Artifacts studies - Historique des versions

Ayoh le 18 septembre 2023 à 08:51

2023-09-18T08:51:47Z

Sammy le 13 juillet 2023 à 12:48

2023-07-13T12:48:38Z

Sammy le 26 juin 2023 à 13:50

2023-06-26T13:50:11Z

Sammy le 26 juin 2023 à 13:48

2023-06-26T13:48:35Z

Sammy le 2 juin 2023 à 08:36

2023-06-02T08:36:46Z

Sammy le 30 mai 2023 à 11:48

2023-05-30T11:48:20Z

Sammy le 9 octobre 2019 à 09:18

2019-10-09T09:18:15Z

Sammy : Page créée avec « Teacher : Pierre-Philippe Duchâtelet This seminar for students of the Masters Degrees in Design and Politics of the Multiple (MA) and Artistic Practices and Sc... »

2019-10-09T09:14:58Z

Page créée avec « Teacher : Pierre-Philippe Duchâtelet This seminar for students of the Masters Degrees in Design and Politics of the Multiple (MA) and Artistic Practices and Sc... »

Nouvelle page

Teacher : [[Pierre-Philippe Duchâtelet]]

This seminar for students of the Masters Degrees in [[Design and Politics of the Multiple (MA)]] and [[Artistic Practices and Scientific Complexity|Artistic Practices and Scientific Complexity (MA)]] supports the multidisciplinary workshop. It aims to develop a study of artifacts - understood as all types of manufactured objects resulting from human activity - in their relationship to politics. Artifacts are numerous: architectural works, chairs, books, road signs, bridges, tomato harvesting machines, drones, closed centres. They can be taken as machines, assemblies, arrangements, objects with "anima" or devices. They are always made up of several parts and elements configured, oriented, drawn deliberately, but also carrying effects outside any determination, and based on a reading of Langdon Winner's text "Do artifacts have politics?", we first address Winner's idea that artifacts can incorporate specific forms of power or ideology. We continue by asking ourselves what this relationship between politics and artifact could mean in order to go beyond Winner's point of view, by recognizing that artefacts have their own capacity to act or to make them act, beyond a simple function as transmitters of ideologies. Several artifacts are introduced into the seminar space throughout the year. Different formats of exchanges are used during the seminar: presentations, discussions, debates, actions and group readings.
At the end of the first quadrennium, students will be asked to compile and link, in written form, different summary notes taken at each seminar session.
During the second quarter, these notes will be the subject of editorial work evaluated at the end of the year.
An understanding of English reading is desirable.

[[Catégorie:English]]
[[Catégorie:M1]]

@@ Ligne 1 : / Ligne 1 : @@
 Teacher : [[Ayoh Kré Duchâtelet]]
-This seminar for master's students [[Master Editorial policy - Design and Politics of the Multiple]] supports the multidisciplinary workshop.
+This course for master's students from [[Master Editorial policy - Design and Politics of the Multiple]] and [[Situated Practices Workshop]] supports the multidisciplinary workshop.
-This course aims to introduce, into the students' curriculum, different approaches from visual studies, cultural studies and a so-called "object-oriented" socio-anthropology. These approaches question the modes of action of images and objects in specific contexts of contemporary society. They are heirs to John Austin's speech act theory, James Gibson's affordance theory and Alfred Gell's anthropological approach. They are interested in the heuristic potential of the notion of device, associated with taking into account the material and technical dimension of social activity (Nicolas Dodier, Janine Barbot, Madeleine Akrich, Jonathan Crary, etc.). They are also heirs to the knowledge, frameworks of thought and perspectives from colonized worlds on which Western thought was nourished during modernity. (Joseph Tonda, Achille Mbembe, Souleymane Bachir Diagne, Samir Boumedienne…).
+The Artifact Studies course begins by looking at how modes of organization, protocols, layouts, architectural edifices, technical objects, urban planning, legal texts, philosophical or legal categories... in short, multiple types of fabrication - act on social reality, transforming us, making us do things, inducing possibilities of action and/or restricting our possibilities of action, enabling and forbidding, preventing, changing us. - in short, multiple kinds of fabrications - act on social reality, transform us, make us do things, induce possibilities of action and/or restrict our possibilities of action, allow and forbid, prevent, change us..., secondly, to the way these devices produce imaginaries in specific socio-cultural contexts, and thirdly to the way all this contributes to the emergence, transformation or destruction of certain kinds of knowledge. The course draws on various approaches from postcolonial, visual and cultural studies, phenomenology and object-oriented socio-anthropology.

← Version précédente		Version du 13 juillet 2023 à 12:48
Ligne 1 :		Ligne 1 :
−	Teacher : [[~~Ayo~~ Kré Duchâtelet]]	+	Teacher : [[Ayoh Kré Duchâtelet]]

	This seminar for master's students [[Master Editorial policy - Design and Politics of the Multiple]] supports the multidisciplinary workshop.		This seminar for master's students [[Master Editorial policy - Design and Politics of the Multiple]] supports the multidisciplinary workshop.

@@ Ligne 1 : / Ligne 1 : @@
 Teacher : [[Ayo Kré Duchâtelet]]
-This seminar for master's students [[Master Editorial policy - Design and Politics of the Multiple]] supports the multidisciplinary workshop. It aims to develop a study of artifacts - understood as all types of manufactured objects resulting from human activity - in their relationship to politics. Artefacts are manifold: architectural structures, chairs, books, road signs, bridges, tomato harvesters, drones, closed centers. They can be seen as machines, assemblages, arrangements, objects endowed with an "anima" or even devices. They are always made up of several parts and elements that are configured, oriented and purposely designed, but also have effects that are beyond all determinations.
+This seminar for master's students [[Master Editorial policy - Design and Politics of the Multiple]] supports the multidisciplinary workshop.
-Based on a reading of Langdon Winner's text "Do artifacts have politics?", we begin by exploring Winner's idea that artifacts can incorporate specific forms of power or ideology. We then go on to consider what this relationship between politics and artifacts might mean, in order to go beyond Winner's point of view by recognizing that artifacts have their own capacity to act or to make others act, beyond the simple function of transmitters of ideologies. Several artifacts are introduced into the seminar space throughout the year.
+This course aims to introduce, into the students' curriculum, different approaches from visual studies, cultural studies and a so-called "object-oriented" socio-anthropology. These approaches question the modes of action of images and objects in specific contexts of contemporary society. They are heirs to John Austin's speech act theory, James Gibson's affordance theory and Alfred Gell's anthropological approach. They are interested in the heuristic potential of the notion of device, associated with taking into account the material and technical dimension of social activity (Nicolas Dodier, Janine Barbot, Madeleine Akrich, Jonathan Crary, etc.). They are also heirs to the knowledge, frameworks of thought and perspectives from colonized worlds on which Western thought was nourished during modernity. (Joseph Tonda, Achille Mbembe, Souleymane Bachir Diagne, Samir Boumedienne…).
-Various exchange formats are used during the seminar: presentations, discussions, debates, actions and collective readings. At the end of the first term, students will be asked to compile and relate, in written form, various summary notes taken during each seminar session. During the second term, these notes will be the subject of an editorial work assessed at the end of the year. Reading comprehension in English is required.
+The course also proposes to focus initially on the way in which architectural buildings, technical objects, urban development, legal texts, organizations, speeches, documents, monuments – in short, multiple genres of human fabrications – act on social reality, transform us, make us do things, induce possibilities of action and/or restrict our possibilities of action, allow and prohibit, prevent, change us…and secondly, at the how these devices produce imaginaries in specific socio-cultural contexts. A set of notions constitutes a course lexicon, the notions of this lexicon are mobilized and discussed during the sessions.

@@ Ligne 1 : / Ligne 1 : @@
 Teacher : [[Ayo Kré Duchâtelet]]
-This seminar for master's students [[Politics and graphic experimentation (MA)]] supports the multidisciplinary workshop. It aims to develop a study of artifacts - understood as all types of manufactured objects resulting from human activity - in their relationship to politics. Artefacts are manifold: architectural structures, chairs, books, road signs, bridges, tomato harvesters, drones, closed centers. They can be seen as machines, assemblages, arrangements, objects endowed with an "anima" or even devices. They are always made up of several parts and elements that are configured, oriented and purposely designed, but also have effects that are beyond all determinations.
+This seminar for master's students [[Master Editorial policy - Design and Politics of the Multiple]] supports the multidisciplinary workshop. It aims to develop a study of artifacts - understood as all types of manufactured objects resulting from human activity - in their relationship to politics. Artefacts are manifold: architectural structures, chairs, books, road signs, bridges, tomato harvesters, drones, closed centers. They can be seen as machines, assemblages, arrangements, objects endowed with an "anima" or even devices. They are always made up of several parts and elements that are configured, oriented and purposely designed, but also have effects that are beyond all determinations.
 Based on a reading of Langdon Winner's text "Do artifacts have politics?", we begin by exploring Winner's idea that artifacts can incorporate specific forms of power or ideology. We then go on to consider what this relationship between politics and artifacts might mean, in order to go beyond Winner's point of view by recognizing that artifacts have their own capacity to act or to make others act, beyond the simple function of transmitters of ideologies. Several artifacts are introduced into the seminar space throughout the year.
 Various exchange formats are used during the seminar: presentations, discussions, debates, actions and collective readings. At the end of the first term, students will be asked to compile and relate, in written form, various summary notes taken during each seminar session. During the second term, these notes will be the subject of an editorial work assessed at the end of the year. Reading comprehension in English is required.

← Version précédente		Version du 2 juin 2023 à 08:36
Ligne 6 :		Ligne 6 :

	Various exchange formats are used during the seminar: presentations, discussions, debates, actions and collective readings. At the end of the first term, students will be asked to compile and relate, in written form, various summary notes taken during each seminar session. During the second term, these notes will be the subject of an editorial work assessed at the end of the year. Reading comprehension in English is required.		Various exchange formats are used during the seminar: presentations, discussions, debates, actions and collective readings. At the end of the first term, students will be asked to compile and relate, in written form, various summary notes taken during each seminar session. During the second term, these notes will be the subject of an editorial work assessed at the end of the year. Reading comprehension in English is required.
−
−
−	~~[[Catégorie:M1]]~~
−	~~[[Catégorie:M2]]~~

← Version précédente		Version du 30 mai 2023 à 11:48
Ligne 1 :		Ligne 1 :
−	~~Professor~~ : [[~~Pierre-Philippe~~ Duchâtelet]]	+	Teacher : [[Ayo Kré Duchâtelet]]
		+
		+	This seminar for master's students [[Politics and graphic experimentation (MA)]] supports the multidisciplinary workshop. It aims to develop a study of artifacts - understood as all types of manufactured objects resulting from human activity - in their relationship to politics. Artefacts are manifold: architectural structures, chairs, books, road signs, bridges, tomato harvesters, drones, closed centers. They can be seen as machines, assemblages, arrangements, objects endowed with an "anima" or even devices. They are always made up of several parts and elements that are configured, oriented and purposely designed, but also have effects that are beyond all determinations.
		+
		+	Based on a reading of Langdon Winner's text "Do artifacts have politics?", we begin by exploring Winner's idea that artifacts can incorporate specific forms of power or ideology. We then go on to consider what this relationship between politics and artifacts might mean, in order to go beyond Winner's point of view by recognizing that artifacts have their own capacity to act or to make others act, beyond the simple function of transmitters of ideologies. Several artifacts are introduced into the seminar space throughout the year.
		+
		+	Various exchange formats are used during the seminar: presentations, discussions, debates, actions and collective readings. At the end of the first term, students will be asked to compile and relate, in written form, various summary notes taken during each seminar session. During the second term, these notes will be the subject of an editorial work assessed at the end of the year. Reading comprehension in English is required.

−	This seminar for students of the Masters Degrees in [[Design and Politics of the Multiple (MA)]] and [[Artistic Practices and Scientific Complexity\|Artistic Practices and Scientific Complexity (MA)]] supports the multidisciplinary workshop. It aims to develop a study of artifacts - understood as all types of manufactured objects resulting from human activity - in their relationship to politics. Artifacts are numerous: architectural works, chairs, books, road signs, bridges, tomato harvesting machines, drones, closed centres. They can be taken as machines, assemblies, arrangements, objects with "anima" or devices. They are always made up of several parts and elements configured, oriented, drawn deliberately, but also carrying effects outside any determination, and based on a reading of Langdon Winner's text "Do artifacts have politics?", we first address Winner's idea that artifacts can incorporate specific forms of power or ideology. We continue by asking ourselves what this relationship between politics and artifact could mean in order to go beyond Winner's point of view, by recognizing that artefacts have their own capacity to act or to make them act, beyond a simple function as transmitters of ideologies. Several artifacts are introduced into the seminar space throughout the year. Different formats of exchanges are used during the seminar: presentations, discussions, debates, actions and group readings.
−	~~At the end of the first quadrennium, students will be asked to compile and link, in written form, different summary notes taken at each seminar session.~~
−	~~During the second quarter, these notes will be the subject of editorial work evaluated at the end of the year.~~
−	~~An understanding of English reading is desirable.~~

−	~~[[Catégorie:English]]~~
	[[Catégorie:M1]]		[[Catégorie:M1]]
		+	[[Catégorie:M2]]

← Version précédente		Version du 9 octobre 2019 à 09:18
Ligne 1 :		Ligne 1 :
−	~~Teacher~~ : [[Pierre-Philippe Duchâtelet]]	+	Professor : [[Pierre-Philippe Duchâtelet]]

	This seminar for students of the Masters Degrees in [[Design and Politics of the Multiple (MA)]] and [[Artistic Practices and Scientific Complexity\|Artistic Practices and Scientific Complexity (MA)]] supports the multidisciplinary workshop. It aims to develop a study of artifacts - understood as all types of manufactured objects resulting from human activity - in their relationship to politics. Artifacts are numerous: architectural works, chairs, books, road signs, bridges, tomato harvesting machines, drones, closed centres. They can be taken as machines, assemblies, arrangements, objects with "anima" or devices. They are always made up of several parts and elements configured, oriented, drawn deliberately, but also carrying effects outside any determination, and based on a reading of Langdon Winner's text "Do artifacts have politics?", we first address Winner's idea that artifacts can incorporate specific forms of power or ideology. We continue by asking ourselves what this relationship between politics and artifact could mean in order to go beyond Winner's point of view, by recognizing that artefacts have their own capacity to act or to make them act, beyond a simple function as transmitters of ideologies. Several artifacts are introduced into the seminar space throughout the year. Different formats of exchanges are used during the seminar: presentations, discussions, debates, actions and group readings.		This seminar for students of the Masters Degrees in [[Design and Politics of the Multiple (MA)]] and [[Artistic Practices and Scientific Complexity\|Artistic Practices and Scientific Complexity (MA)]] supports the multidisciplinary workshop. It aims to develop a study of artifacts - understood as all types of manufactured objects resulting from human activity - in their relationship to politics. Artifacts are numerous: architectural works, chairs, books, road signs, bridges, tomato harvesting machines, drones, closed centres. They can be taken as machines, assemblies, arrangements, objects with "anima" or devices. They are always made up of several parts and elements configured, oriented, drawn deliberately, but also carrying effects outside any determination, and based on a reading of Langdon Winner's text "Do artifacts have politics?", we first address Winner's idea that artifacts can incorporate specific forms of power or ideology. We continue by asking ourselves what this relationship between politics and artifact could mean in order to go beyond Winner's point of view, by recognizing that artefacts have their own capacity to act or to make them act, beyond a simple function as transmitters of ideologies. Several artifacts are introduced into the seminar space throughout the year. Different formats of exchanges are used during the seminar: presentations, discussions, debates, actions and group readings.