Actions

Typography (MA) : Différence entre versions

De erg

(Page créée avec « Professors : Manuela Dechamps Otamendi, Renaud Huberlant The typography course in Masters questions the creative resources of typography. In this context, typogra... »)
 
 
Ligne 1 : Ligne 1 :
Professors : [[Manuela Dechamps Otamendi]], [[Renaud Huberlant]]
+
Professors: [[Renaud Huberlant]], [[Ludivine Loiseau]]
  
The typography course in Masters questions the creative resources of typography. In this context, typography is seen more as a mean than as an end. The issues of characters drawing are downplayed in favor of the cultural, critical and historical foundation of typography.
+
The research in typography at the erg questions its experimentation.
The course is organised in practical modules of different length and range. Each module gives a specific context blending historical, economical, artistic, societal data that students explore from and with the field of typography.
+
 
In relation to this specific and documented context, each student is given – or chooses – an area of research and a practical, experimental and contemporary work.
+
The notions of research and experimentation are mixed here to affirm that typographic uses are not predefined.
Students are never asked to provide a “solution” to a given "problem”, but rather to enrich and to problematize the notions and concepts studied.
+
The workshop proposes to the students to carry out projects in which typography opens a wider questioning.  
 +
Typography can question the students' approach and practice as well as be questioned by and for itself.  
 +
 
 +
Here are some common questions asked by students in the workshop:
 +
 
 +
- What place, for what meaning, does typography have in the work I do in other workshops, my TFE for example?
 +
 
 +
- How does typography, in its arrangements on paper or on screen - or in any other medium - question the mediation of the meaning it conveys?
 +
 
 +
- Why and how does typography attribute such an assertive identity to the media it inhabits, that it dresses?
 +
 
 +
- Is typography always textual and what does it become outside the agreed context of its reading?
 +
 
 +
- Can we deconstruct, decolonize, de-genderize typography and question its relationship to standards and classifications?
 +
 
 +
- What plastic language is at work in the typographic use of many artists or how to make work with typography?
 +
 
 +
- Typography is not only an image, it is also sound and language, it is also gesture and writing... how to account for it?
 +
 
 +
- Throughout history, typography has always reflected the concerns of its time: artistic, political, economic... and today?
 +
 
 +
In order to explore these (and other) lines of research through experimentation, three course modules are offered in the master's program:
 +
 
 +
1. A module of creation and typographic use which launches a collective work on a given question. (Thursday 2-5pm with Renaud Huberlant)
 +
 
 +
2. A module of research and free experimentation, based on a project initiated by the student (Thursday 5-8pm with Renaud Huberlant)
 +
 
 +
3. A character design module (Thursday 5-8pm with Ludivine Loiseau)
  
 
[[Catégorie:English]]
 
[[Catégorie:English]]
At the end of the cycle, each student is asked to conduct a parallel work related to and consistent with their dissertation and their thesis in order to provide a typographic explanation.
 

Version actuelle datée du 20 octobre 2021 à 10:50

Professors: Renaud Huberlant, Ludivine Loiseau

The research in typography at the erg questions its experimentation.

The notions of research and experimentation are mixed here to affirm that typographic uses are not predefined. The workshop proposes to the students to carry out projects in which typography opens a wider questioning. Typography can question the students' approach and practice as well as be questioned by and for itself.

Here are some common questions asked by students in the workshop:

- What place, for what meaning, does typography have in the work I do in other workshops, my TFE for example?

- How does typography, in its arrangements on paper or on screen - or in any other medium - question the mediation of the meaning it conveys?

- Why and how does typography attribute such an assertive identity to the media it inhabits, that it dresses?

- Is typography always textual and what does it become outside the agreed context of its reading?

- Can we deconstruct, decolonize, de-genderize typography and question its relationship to standards and classifications?

- What plastic language is at work in the typographic use of many artists or how to make work with typography?

- Typography is not only an image, it is also sound and language, it is also gesture and writing... how to account for it?

- Throughout history, typography has always reflected the concerns of its time: artistic, political, economic... and today?

In order to explore these (and other) lines of research through experimentation, three course modules are offered in the master's program:

1. A module of creation and typographic use which launches a collective work on a given question. (Thursday 2-5pm with Renaud Huberlant)

2. A module of research and free experimentation, based on a project initiated by the student (Thursday 5-8pm with Renaud Huberlant)

3. A character design module (Thursday 5-8pm with Ludivine Loiseau)